How a National Healthcare Provider Took Back Page 1 of Google
A venture-funded healthcare company came to us in the middle of a hostile news cycle. Searching their brand name returned investigations, complaint portals, a critical video, and "is it a scam" threads before you ever reached their own website. Over twelve months of measured, monthly work, we pushed more than two-thirds of the tracked negative links out of Google's top 30 and returned page 1 to content the brand owns or welcomes. As with every client, their identity stays confidential.
Tell us who to search for. A specialist scans your search results and replies with a private assessment of what can be suppressed, and honest odds.
Something went wrong sending your request. Please try again, or WhatsApp us directly.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Why This Case Study Doesn't Name the Client
Reputation management only works if it is invisible. Naming a client in a case study would attach their brand to the very crisis they hired us to move past, undoing the work. So every case study we publish follows one rule: the story and the numbers are real, taken directly from the monthly reports we shared with the client, but the brand name, the search phrases, and every identifying detail are withheld or generalized. Prospective clients get the same protection from day one.
The engagement at a glance
The Situation: A Brand Name That Searched Like a Warning
The client is a well-known healthcare services provider operating across India. A run of critical press had taken over their search results. When a patient, investor, or job candidate searched the brand, this is what page 1 served them.
Investigative articles in national business media
Multiple long-form investigations into the company's internal affairs sat at positions 1 to 8 on the brand search, and ranked for every variation of the name. These were high-authority news domains that do not simply fade with time.
A critical video in the top 5
A widely watched video critical of the company ranked in the top five results for the brand name and appeared across several related searches, giving the story a second life every time it was recommended.
Complaint portals and "is it a scam" threads
Consumer complaint aggregators, a one-star review page ranking above the official site, and forum threads asking whether the company was a scam filled the middle of page 1 for every "reviews" search.
Fresh negatives kept arriving
This was not a single bad story. New critical articles kept entering the search results month after month as the news cycle continued, so anything we did had to hold up against a moving target, not a fixed list.
Is your page 1 telling the wrong story?
We will search your brand the way your customers do and show you exactly what we would suppress, remove, or outrank, before you spend a rupee.
What We Did, Month by Month
No shortcuts and no fake takedowns. Suppression is a ranking discipline: you measure where every negative link sits, build assets that deserve to outrank it, and repeat until page 1 belongs to the brand.
Mapped every negative link
We audited all six branded search phrases people actually used, from the brand name alone to "reviews" and company-name variations, and logged every negative URL with its exact page and position. This became the baseline for monthly measurement.
Built and promoted ranking assets
We strengthened the official site and social profiles, placed positive and neutral coverage, generated genuine reviews on the platforms that ranked, and responded publicly to existing ones, giving Google better answers for every branded search.
Measured, reported, repeated
Every month the client received a before-and-after position report for every tracked link. New negative links entering the results were caught in the same sweep and added to the suppression queue immediately.
The Results
Numbers below are taken directly from the monthly position reports we shared with the client over the engagement.
Page 1, before and after
At the start, five of the top results for the brand name were negative. By the end of the engagement, complaint portals, the one-star aggregator page, and every scam thread were suppressed beyond the top 30 on all tracked searches, and page 1 was led by the official site, verified reviews, and positive press.
Two of every three negative links, out of sight
Of the 35+ negative URLs tracked at peak, more than two-thirds were pushed out of Google's top 30, where effectively no one ever looks. The rest were pinned to late page 2 and page 3, replaced on page 1 by content the brand controls.
Mid-engagement, fresh critical articles from new news cycles entered the search results. Because every branded search was monitored monthly, each new link was caught within one reporting cycle and suppressed using assets that were already ranking, which is exactly why suppression is built as a system, not a one-time cleanup.
Questions About This Case Study
Why is the client not named?
Did you remove the negative articles?
How long did it take to see movement?
Could you do this for my company?
Get the same report this client got
A private, keyword-by-keyword scan of your brand's search results, what is negative, where it ranks, and what it would take to move it.