Fifteen Hostile Reviews, Four Months, Two Continents
A logistics-technology company hiring across North America and India watched its recruitment pipeline dry up as hostile reviews stacked on Glassdoor and AmbitionBox. Over four monthly cycles we removed fifteen of them through platform policy processes, ten from Glassdoor and five from AmbitionBox, at a steady cadence of three to seven takedowns a month, each documented with before-and-after proof in the monthly report. Client identity confidential, as with every case study we publish.
Tell us your company. A specialist audits your employer profiles and replies privately with removal odds and a monthly plan.
Something went wrong sending your request. Please try again, or WhatsApp us directly.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Why Cadence Beats a One-Time Purge
Review platforms process takedown reports one at a time, on their own schedule, and mass-flagging a profile backfires. The removals here landed month after month, two or three in one report, seven in another, because each review was individually assessed against platform policy and reported with its own evidence. Four months in, the profiles candidates saw in both hiring markets told a current story instead of an old grudge.
The engagement at a glance
Every removal here was a separate case built on a specific policy violation, filed properly and proven with before-and-after screenshots. That is slower than the miracle purge nobody can actually deliver, and it is why the removals stuck.
Clean your employer profiles the way that lasts
A private review-by-review audit with honest removal odds, and a monthly cadence that keeps landing them.